Meaning: Trump’s demonstration in Texas shows exactly why he is so dangerous

During the meeting, Trump claimed that those who have been accused in the attack on the US capital on January 6 are being “treated so unfairly”, and hinted astonishingly that some might deserve pardon. “If I run, and if I win,” Trump said to the crowd of thousands, “we will treat these people fairly from January 6 … And if it requires pardon, we will give them pardons.” But more alarming than that was Trump, who urged his supporters to take part in “the biggest protests we’ve ever had” if the prosecutors investigating him and his financial transactions “do something wrong or illegal.”

Think back to December 2020, when Trump called for a protest because he felt he had erred in the 2020 election result – the end result was the deadly Capitol attack. Although his role in that result is being investigated, Trump obviously knows how it played out.

That’s why common sense says Trump is now urging his supporters to potentially regroup in huge numbers to help him correct any mistakes that should ring the alarm bells. This is especially true given Trump’s apparent message to his supporters on Saturday that if you commit acts of violence in his name, he will consider pardoning you if he ever becomes president again.

In normal times, it would be scary to hear an American political leader make such statements. But this is far beyond normal. This is dangerous considering that just over a year ago there was a violent attack on our Capitol by Trump supporters based on a lie Trump had created and spread about election fraud.

This is not the first time Trump has expressed sympathy for those who were part of the “domestic terrorism” act on January 6, when FBI Director Christopher Wray classified the riot. For example, ahead of a September rally in support of the detainees, Trump issued a statement saying “our hearts and minds are with the people who are being persecuted so unfairly in connection with the January 6 protest.”
“Trump has now taken his commitment to the January 6 attacks – which I believe should rightly be called terrorists, given the FBI’s designation – to a new level, calling for the prosecution of more than 700 people who attacked the Capitol.” a disgrace.” ”
Does this mean that Trump does not believe that those who wounded more than 140 police officers – some very seriously, by attacking them with batons, poles, chemical sprays and other weapons – will have to face consequences? For example, Donald Hazard, a Texas resident, was arrested and charged in December with allegedly assaulting Capitol police. According to court documents, Hazard was fighting with police officers during the riot, which led to one being “knocked unconscious … (with) injuries to the head, foot and arm.” A December release from the DOJ indicated that Hazard was detained pending further trials.
Neil Young put his finger on the great divide of the United States
Or maybe Trump is upset about the accusation against Jeffrey Sabol, who allegedly not only assaulted police officers, but helped drag a wounded police officer face down into the crowd so others could beat him. According to a lawsuit, Sabol took drastic measures at the Capitol on January 6 because he had “reached a mental breaking point.” Last fall, Sabol remained in custody. Perhaps Trump hopes to pardon the 11 members of the right-wing paramilitary group The Oath Keepers if they were to be convicted on charges of “rebellious conspiracy” in connection with the January 6 attack (last week, 10 pleaded not guilty while the 11th was absent and did not submit any plea).
While the ghost of pardons is astounding, it’s fantasy for now, when Trump first had to win a presidential campaign in 2024, which he has not even announced. Trump’s plea to his supporters to take part in mass protests if he is accused of crimes is potentially more dangerous, as it is a more immediate option. Trump can feel the heat from a district attorney in the Atlanta area who has been approved to appoint a special grand jury to investigate potential crimes from Trump in connection with attempts to end the election in Georgia in 2020. And that is not to mention the latest developments surrounding the New York Attorney General’s investigation into Trump’s previous business dealings.
After complaining about these investigations and the House Committee’s investigative work on January 6, Trump roared to his supporters on Saturday that “If these radical, vicious, racist accusers do anything wrong or illegal, I hope we will have the biggest protest in this land. we’ve ever had. ”

We all know that if Trump is prosecuted for any reason, he will call it “wrong or illegal.” From there, Trump is likely to follow the same book that led to the January 6 attack by radicalizing his supporters with lies – but this time with lies aimed at criminal prosecution.

Would Trump call his supporters to encircle courthouses or prosecutors, as he did when he called them to Washington, DC on January 6 to “stop the theft”? Again, given what happened that day, we can not rule out that possibility, nor the possibility that this could lead to violence from some extremists in the Trump base.
At the very least, his words could be interpreted as Trump trying to get prosecutors to think twice about persecuting him for fear of protests, or even threats being directed at them by more radical sections of Trump’s base.
If the past is a prologue, the answer is no – although a few, including senses Susan Collins and Lindsey Graham, have both spoken out against Trump’s pardon idea. In fact, I would predict that if Trump were to eventually face charges stemming from one of the current investigations, one of the key promises required of Republicans seeking the GOP’s presidential candidate would be a promise to pardon Trump.
The former president’s proposal for pardon to those who led the attack on January 6 to stop the peaceful transfer of power should disqualify him from ever holding office again. The same should be the case if Trump calls on thousands to flood the streets to protest any criminal charges against him personally – even if it leads to violence. But with today’s GOP, that’s unlikely to be the case; according to a recent CBS News poll, 56% of Republicans see the Capitol attack as an act “defending freedom”.

These are not developments that should ever take place in the United States. Yet they happen right before our eyes. The only question is whether enough Americans will recognize the danger in this rhetoric before it is too late for our republic.

Leave a Comment